Big army comparsion. Russia vs West.
- Hjh Kfjd
- před 26 minutami
- Minut čtení: 3

Main Battle Tanks
Russia: T-90M / T-14 Armata
Weight: T-90M approx. 48 tons, T-14 approx. 55 tons
Main armament: 125mm smoothbore gun 2A46M-5, capable of firing guided missiles (ATGM range up to 5 km)
Armor: composite and reactive armor, Afganit active protection system (T-14)
Maximum speed: approx. 60 km/h
Production and deployment: T-90M widely deployed, T-14 limited production
West: M1A2 Abrams (USA) / Leopard 2A7 (Germany)
Weight: Abrams approx. 62 tons, Leopard 2 approx. 62 tons
Main armament: 120mm smoothbore Rheinmetall L/44 or L/55
Armor: composite, reactive, Trophy active protection system (Abrams)
Maximum speed: approx. 67 km/h
Production and deployment: mass-produced, widely deployed in NATO
Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFV)
Russia: BMP-3
Armament: 100mm cannon + 30mm autocannon + 9M117 Bastion ATGM (range 4 km)
Protection: armor protects against 14.5 mm rounds, weaker side protection
Speed: up to 70 km/h, amphibious capabilities
West: Bradley M2 (USA)
Armament: 25mm M242 cannon, TOW anti-tank guided missiles (range up to 4 km)
Protection: armor resistant to 30mm rounds, Trophy active protection
Speed: approx. 61 km/h
Air Defense Systems
Russia
S-400 Triumf: missile range up to 400 km, air target altitude up to 30 km
Pantsir-S1: combination of 30mm cannons and guided missiles with range approx. 20 km
Buk-M3: missile range approx. 70 km, altitude up to 35 km
West (NATO)
Patriot PAC-3 (USA): missile range approx. 35 km, capable of intercepting ballistic and cruise missiles
NASAMS (Norway/USA): range approx. 25 km, mobile system
SAMP/T (France/Italy): range approx. 100 km
Rocket Systems (Artillery and Missiles)
Russia
BM-21 Grad: 122mm rockets, range approx. 20-40 km
BM-30 Smerch: 300mm rockets, range up to 90 km
Iskander-M: ballistic missile with range up to 500 km
West
M270 MLRS (USA): 227mm rockets, range approx. 30-70 km depending on type
HIMARS (USA): mobile MLRS variant, range approx. 70 km
ATACMS: ballistic missile with range up to 300 km
Man-Portable Anti-Tank Weapons
Russia
RPG-7: classic anti-tank grenade launcher, effective up to approx. 300 m
Kornet-EM: guided missile, range up to 8 km, capable of destroying modern tanks
Metis-M: range approx. 1.5 km
West
FGM-148 Javelin (USA): guided missile with range approx. 2.5 km, top-attack capability
NLAW (UK/Sweden): range approx. 600 m, lightweight and portable
Spike (Israel): range up to 4 km, multiple variants
Man-Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS)
Russia
Igla-S: range approx. 6 km, altitude up to 3.5 km
Verba: upgraded version of Igla with better resistance to jamming
West
FIM-92 Stinger (USA): range approx. 5 km, altitude approx. 3.8 km
Starstreak (UK): range approx. 7 km, high missile speed
Artillery
Russia
2S19 Msta-S: self-propelled 152mm howitzer, range approx. 24-29 km (up to 36 km with rocket-assisted projectiles)
D-30: towed 122mm howitzer, range approx. 15.4 km
West
M109A7 Paladin (USA): self-propelled 155mm howitzer, range approx. 24-30 km (up to 40 km with rocket-assisted projectiles)
FH70 (Germany/UK): towed 155mm howitzer, range approx. 24-30 km
Helicopters
Russia
Mi-28N "Havoc": attack helicopter with 30mm cannon, anti-tank missiles (Ataka), max speed approx. 300 km/h, combat radius approx. 450 km
Ka-52 "Alligator": attack helicopter with 30mm cannon, anti-tank missiles (Vikhr), max speed approx. 300 km/h, combat radius approx. 460 km
Mi-8/17: transport helicopter, widely used for troop transport and support, max speed approx. 250 km/h
West
AH-64E Apache (USA): attack helicopter with 30mm M230 chain gun, Hellfire anti-tank missiles, max speed approx. 293 km/h, combat radius approx. 480 km
Eurocopter Tiger (France/Germany): attack helicopter with 30mm cannon, HOT3/Spike missiles, max speed approx. 290 km/h, combat radius approx. 500 km
UH-60 Black Hawk (USA): transport helicopter, max speed approx. 280 km/h, widely used for troop transport and medevac
Summary of Effectiveness and Combat Performance
Russian equipment is generally cheaper, robust, and designed for mass deployment but often suffers from weaker electronics, less crew protection, and lower fire accuracy. It is frequently deployed in large waves, resulting in higher material and personnel losses.
Western equipment is technologically more advanced, with better protection, precision, and logistical support, leading to lower casualties and higher mission success rates.
This comparison shows that Russian forces rely on quantity and durability, while Western militaries leverage technological superiority and precision, impacting overall battlefield effectiveness.
Comments